Saturday, February 4, 2012

What, Since Websters Dictionary now includes the definition for marriage as the state of being united to a?

"the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage."



Does that mean it's true?



If you need a link to this information, I will give it to you, just ask.What, Since Websters Dictionary now includes the definition for marriage as the state of being united to a?
Hi Deb,

They changed the defintion to fit the popular belief of the times. All through time up until now it has been defined as being between a man and a woman.



Rom 1:26 "Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural ones.



Rom 1:27 "In the same way the men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed indecent acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion."



Rom 1:28 "Furthermore, since they did not think it worthwhile to retain the knowledge of God, he gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what ought not to be done."
Nope, the definition is in the bible. The dictionary is just to be PC about the situation. But marriage is a religious term anyways. The dictionary is wrong.What, Since Websters Dictionary now includes the definition for marriage as the state of being united to a?
No.

Marriage was instituted in Paradise when man was in innocence (Gen. 2:18-24).



May I suggest Crudens exhaustive concordance with definitions and Halley's Bible Handbook for correct use and definitions of Biblical terminology.What, Since Websters Dictionary now includes the definition for marriage as the state of being united to a?
I think Daniel Webster is turning in his grave right now.



"Real goodness does not attach itself merely to this life; it points to another world" D.Webster.
Other people can believe what they want, as for me and mine we will stick with God's Dictionary, it was around alone time before Websters' and will be around long after Websters' is gone since it is the one that will least through eternity and Websters' is just going to burn up like the others.
This only shows that there is only one Word that is true and that is the Word of God. When they start changing the laws against believers we have to stick to one another and encourage one another to keep the faith. Websters is just showing us that we need to keep our faith and our beliefs separate from the world.

God Bless and keep the faith my dear one. :)
No it doesn't. The dictionary is no moral guide of any kind.
Not in the eyes of GOD is it true. that is what counts, not mankind's ideals.
The homosexuals and lesbians have gained considerable political and social momentum in America. They have "come out" as the term goes, left their closets, and are knocking on the doors of your homes. Through TV, Radio, Newspapers, and Magazines, they are preaching their doctrine of tolerance, equality, justice, and love. They do not want to be perceived as abnormal or dangerous. They want acceptance and they want you to welcome them with open, loving arms, approving of what they do.



In numerous states in America several bills have been introduced by the pro homosexual politicians to ensure that the practice of homosexuality is a right protected by law. Included in these bills are statements affecting employers, renters, and schools. Even churches would be required to hire a quota of homosexuals with "sensitivity" training courses to be "strongly urged" in various work places. There is even legislation that would make the state pick up the tab for the defense of homosexuality in lawsuits, while requiring the non homosexual side to pay out of his/her pocket.



The Christian church has not stood idle. When it has spoken out against this political immorality, the cry of "separation of church and state" is shouted at the "religious bigots." But when the homosexual community uses political power to control the church, no such cry of bigotry is heard. Political correctness says it is okay for the homosexual community to impose its will upon churches, but not the other way around. Apparently, it isn't politically correct to side with Christians.

No comments:

Post a Comment