Webster's Dictionary does not have a definition for "Neo-Lieberal." Why do CONS continue to use a term that

is not in our Modern Dictionary?Webster's Dictionary does not have a definition for "Neo-Lieberal." Why do CONS continue to use a term that
Because they can.



Deal with it neo-lieberal.
neo-liberal is actually what bush is but i dont want to confuse cons by using it.Webster's Dictionary does not have a definition for "Neo-Lieberal." Why do CONS continue to use a term that
First time I heard about it. Guess the neo-cons want to pass off their namesWebster's Dictionary does not have a definition for "Neo-Lieberal." Why do CONS continue to use a term that
Give us all a break, Please!
lol it shows everything is progressing with time. Neocons and helping liberals get up to speed with a new name. I think its spiffy
Because they are not smart enough to discuss issues, so they just make up slurs.
You mean some cons?, man you are very stereotypical. You are wasting your questions. All you want is someone who agrees with you. I dont. Im not prejudiced.
All part of the noble goals of some of the right wing to completely quash all intelligent political debate by completely disrespecting people with opposing viewpoints.....
i think nancy pelosi and harry reid should call for congress to launch a full fledged investigation into this matter. did Bush know about this? is Rove behind it? was 9/11 and the Iraq War a diversion so people wouldn't pay attention to the use of this "non-word?" also, democratic congress-persons should pass a non-binding resolution against it in protest. and finally, in the name of political correctness, free speech and fairness, the term should be outlawed under penalty of death.
If you can't win an argument through logic and reason, the next best thing is shouting rhetoric while you disparage your opponent.
The popular consensus seems to be that it is a play on words, a pun, if you will. Lie-beral as in lying liberal.

It's rather juvenile, right up there with cuntservatives, libtards, repubtards, etc.
The conservatives love to insult people instead of sourcing their opinion.
Personally I don't understand why they use it either.



Terms or phrases like: Pantiwaste he-man liberal, nannyfied metro-sexual, typical/common day U.S. hypocrite, G'ore afied fancy prancer and vaginaterian usually come to mind long before anything as silly as using the worn out term neo-liberal.





edit:

Dave K:

"All part of the noble goals of some of the right wing to completely quash all intelligent political debate by completely disrespecting people with opposing viewpoints....."



True.



'Tis better to balk at all the troubles our government goes through instead of actually coming up with anything worthy of leading our Country in a step in the right direction rather than learning how to be productive; as opposed to being counter-productive by wasting millions of OUR dollars each day by babbling about what each other said (as liberal politicians do regarding conservative politicians) instead of getting off the damn phones with the media and roll up their sleeves and GET BACK TO WORK DOING SOMETHING WORTH WHILE.



Like working TOGETHER as they all did after the first few months after 9/11. It was the fist time our frikking Country was actually productive in nearly 70 years.



There's a ton of conservatives just as guilty but don't have nearly as many ears to bend as the liberals due - regarding the media.