Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Should Webster's Dictionary put Obama's picture next to the word: Failure?

No, in the Thesaurus under FailureShould Webster's Dictionary put Obama's picture next to the word: Failure?
Can't be done...Georgia Bush is already on there.
Either that or incompetent.Should Webster's Dictionary put Obama's picture next to the word: Failure?
I think the notion that anyone can summarize 1/4 of a term a failure is indeed a FAILED ASSUMPTION.Should Webster's Dictionary put Obama's picture next to the word: Failure?
No. Webster's Dictionary doesn't allow the conservative redefinition of words to pollute their pages. They are trying to provide respectable, reliable reference material.
Pro-traditional American and grand theft pants would be there. They are Paul Grass' sock accounts and they have failed at tricking anybody.
Nope that spot has been taken, perhaps success will be his banner when he gets reelected and turns the sour grapes into bitter vinegar.
Uma.
I have a wonderful Idea how about you step away from the keyboard for a bit, and go educate yourself.
I do believe this President has become the Poster person for the term.

Everything this man has touched has gone south in one form or another,
Can't put it next to liar, that space is taken up with McConnell, Boehner, %26amp; Cantor.
No. That space should be reserved for Dubbya.
http://ithp.org/Going%20Postal/olbermann.html
I'm not sure about failure just yet... I'd definitely put his picture next to the word "narcissist" though.
Yeah, that wouldn't even begin to cover it though...they should put destroyer as well...
  • holiday makeup
  • No comments:

    Post a Comment